skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76000 Find in a Library
Title: Mad and the Bad - An Inquiry Into the Disposition of the Criminally Insane
Journal: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy  Volume:2  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1977)  Pages:244-304
Author(s): L V Kaplan
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 61
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Following an analysis of the concepts of criminal responsibility and mental illness, this paper examines the clinical services in a Wisconsin maximum security prison and concludes that the present system of separating the criminally insane from other prisoners should be maintained.
Abstract: Critics of the insanity defense and the separation of the mad and the bad in correctional facilities have contended that there are other offenders who because of environmental conditions have as little control over their behavior as those classified as mentally ill. This paper first outlines current legal views of criminal responsibility and then addresses the rehabilitation theory of punishment as well as arguments that it has been simply a rationalization for maltreatment. The current trend in criminal law theory toward a harm model which focuses on the social harm caused by an offender and effective dispositions rather than personal responsibility is discussed. Contemporary definitions of mental illness are explored from sociological, anthropological, and psychiatric perspectives and theories which defend the concept of mental illness against those who consider it mythological are summarized. In order to evaluate treatment of the criminally insane and the role of responsibility in everyday criminal dispositions, clinical services offered in Wisconsin's maximum security prison are described. Patient confidentiality, staff experience, caseloads, therapy objectives, and criteria for transfer to security hospitals are covered. The clinicians did not practice coercive therapy, but concentrated on helping inmates adjust to harsh prison life. Data are lacking on the therapeutic effectiveness of both prison and security hospitals, but effectiveness should not be measured solely by recidivism rates. The survey of Wisconsin's correctional facilities indicates that the environment of the maximum security hospital is more benign than prison for offenders judged as criminally insane or mentally ill. Better mental health services are needed in all prison facilities, but are unlikely to be implemented because of funding constraints. The insanity defense and related categories should be reserved for those cases where offenders on their own volition raise such a defense successfully. The appendix contains a description of other prisons and the maximum security hospital in Wisconsin. Tables, footnotes, and 86 references are provided.
Index Term(s): Criminally insane persons; Inmate Programs; Insanity defense; Mentally ill offenders; Wisconsin
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.