skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76595 Find in a Library
Title: Plea Bargaining in Juvenile Court (From National Conference on Juvenile Justice - 8th, 1981 - See NCJ-76585)
Author(s): L R Abrahamson; L Ayres
Date Published: 1981
Sponsoring Agency: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
Reno, NV 89507
Sale Source: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
P.O. Box 8970
Reno, NV 89507
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Opposing views on plea bargaining in juvenile court are presented at the 1981 National Conference on Juvenile Justice.
Abstract: A chief deputy district attorney from Fort Collins, Colo., begins with a definition of plea bargaining and indicates that he will focus on charge bargaining. Such bargaining is viewed as having no place in a juvenile court. The results of a study of students' attitudes towards their teachers are reviewed to demonstrate that children prefer fair and firm handling. In terms of juvenile justice, such handling can only be assured when clear standards for children's behavior are set and then enforced in full agreement with preestablished guidelines. Instead of charging juveniles with a number of offenses, prosecutors should select the charge that makes the most sense to the offender -- the charge most closely associated with the youth's concept of wrongdoing. An assistant public defender from Minneapolis, Minn., argues that plea bargaining must be seen in the reality of individual jurisdictions and situations. Allowances must be made for situations in which a charge might call for a heavier penalty than actual circumstances warrant and for the possibility that new information regarding a case may arise after a prosecutor has decided on a charge. A table of contents is included.
Index Term(s): Audiovisual aids; Juvenile processing; Multiple charges; Plea negotiations; Workshops and seminars
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. This is a selection on side 5. It continues on side six. The running time is 23 minutes.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.