skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76621 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Adjudication and Sentencing in a Misdemeanor Court - The Outcome Is the Punishment
Journal: Law and Society Review  Volume:15  Issue:1  Dated:(1980-81)  Pages:79-108
Author(s): J P Ryan
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice

US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 78-NI-AX-0072
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Contrasting local political cultures account for the difference in the severity of the sanctions imposed upon convicted defendants in the Columbus (Ohio) Municipal Court and the New Haven (Connecticut) lower court.
Abstract: Data were collected on 2,764 cases scheduled for a pretrial during March, April, and May, 1978. The data included type and seriousness of offense, number of charges, type of defense counsel, judge at pretrial and disposition, mode of disposition, and sentence or sanctions imposed. Additionally, prior record information was collected from prosecutor files for drunk driving cases. Formal, semistructured interviews were conducted with such persons as the supervisors of the municipal units of the prosecutor's offices and public defenders and six municipal court judges. The interviews focused on such issues as modes of case disposition, judicial styles in plea bargaining, and the operations of arraignment court. In addition, 10 judges were observed for several hours at a time in pretrial sessions and other functions. A stepwise regression model was used to analyze data. The findings were compared with the data from a 1979 study of the New Haven lower court. Outcomes were more costly to convicted defendants in Columbus. Fines were substantial, incarceration was not infrequent, and in traffic cases drivers license were in jeopardy. Furthermore, courtroom actors behaved as if the outcome was important. For example, defense counsel stalled at pretrial hoping for a more sympathetic prosecutor or bargain on the day of trial. To explain why outcomes were more punishing in Columbus than in New Haven an overview of local political cultures of the two cities was conducted. It showed that New Haven was a criminal court system that reflected the particularistic values of ethnic, religious, political, and family association in its rendering of swift, substantive justice. Columbus, by contrast, was a system that reflected the universalistic values of professional competence and technical efficiency in its rendering of swift but formal justice through the mechanisms of an adversary system as applied to a misdemeanor court. The political culture of Columbus bred a climate of severity. Statistical data and about 20 references are included.
Index Term(s): Connecticut; Cultural influences; Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Jury decisionmaking; Ohio; Political influences; Verdicts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.