skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76718 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Small Claims Court Process in New York State
Author(s): G Ryan; S Roth; R S Isreal; I Wikler
Corporate Author: New York State
Cmssn on Management and Productivity in the Public Sector
United States of America
Date Published: 1978
Page Count: 60
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
New York State
Albany, NY 12223
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The small claims court process in New York State is examined, focusing on the lack of uniformity among the jurisdictions, the extent to which diversity affects court use, and the judgment collection problem.
Abstract: The impetus for establishing small claims courts was the need to provide a forum to expedite resolutions of civil disputes between laymen who possessed claims that were economically impractical for representation by counsel. Automobile accidents, landlord-tenant disputes, and other debt collection actions involving $1,000 or less comprise a major portion of the claims instituted in the State. A survey of the small claims courts throughout the State revealed a wide disparity in court rules and procedures among different jurisdictions. This lack of uniformity is affected by the cost of bringing an action, accessibility of the court to claimants and defendants, and the use of arbitrators. Several measures should be instituted to ensure statewide uniformity. It is recommended that all jurisdictions use the certified mailing option to serve process on defendants, as provided by statute. The Office of Court Administration should collect caseload data from all jurisdictions. Accessibility of the courts should be assessed in all jurisdictions with respect to convenience of hours, number of cases per session, and proximity of the court to potential litigants. In addition, the use of an arbitrator constitutes a major savings in judicial cost effectiveness. It is unfortunate that few of the surveyed jurisdictions use this technique. Finally, difficulties inherent in collecting unsatisfied judgments that permeate the entire civil court system are magnified in small claims courts, where inexperienced judgment creditors attempt to collect their awarded compensations and must depend upon the sheriff to effect collection activities. It is suggested that the Secretary of State or the State Consumer Protection Board be involved in such collections, because many businesses are conducted in more than one jurisdiction. Five tables, appendixes, a 52-item bibliography, and 39 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Dispute processing; Dispute resolution; Efficiency; Municipal courts; New York; Small claims courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.