skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76729 Find in a Library
Title: Historical Look at BIA (Bureau of Indian Affairs) Police on the Reservations
Journal: American Indian Journal  Volume:6  Issue:5  Dated:(May 1980)  Pages:13-18
Author(s): D Wachtel
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 6
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Jurisdictional issues regarding Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) police and non-Indians are discussed, especially in relation to the Supreme Court ruling in Oliphant v. Suquamish (1978).
Abstract: In the Oliphant decision, the Court ruled that Indian tribal courts do not have inherent criminal jurisdiction to try non-Indians and may not assume such jurisdiction unless given specific congressional authorization. Historically, BIA police forces were established to maintain law and order among the native inhabitants. From 1869 until 1908, Indian police forces operated relatively freely from any central control. However, several court cases led to the passage of the Major Crimes Act of 1885, which gave Federal courts and police jurisdiction over certain criminal offenses involving Indians on the reservation. Termination of tribal existence adds another dimension to the question of jurisdiction on Indian reservations. This matter is important because it brings those Indians within the jurisdiction of the State and local courts and outside the Oliphant decision. Some experts believe that Oliphant merely establishes the jurisdiction of Federal agencies over non-Indian offenders who commit crimes against Indians on the reservations. Another group argues that the decision opens the reservation to non-Indian criminals. Cross-deputization of tribal officers (as both Indian police officers and as State or local police officers) may be a solution to the jurisdictional dispute. Eleven references are included.
Index Term(s): American Indians; Indian justice; Judicial decisions; Jurisdiction; Reservation crimes; Reservation law enforcement; Tribal police; US Supreme Court
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.