skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76762 Find in a Library
Title: End of Legal Kidnapping in Pennsylvania - The Development of a Decided Public Policy
Journal: Villanova Law Review  Volume:25  Dated:(May 1980)  Pages:784-810
Author(s): F N Frank
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 27
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The law bearing upon parental kidnapping in Pennsylvania is examined; with particular attention to the State's law prior to adoption of the child custody acts and deficiencies in reform laws.
Abstract: Prior to 1977, Pennsylvania lacked a civil statute barring parental kidnapping, and the lone criminal statute proscribing such activity was rarely used. Parents were encouraged by the law and the courts to kidnap their children from the parent having custody, take the child into the jurisdiction of the noncustodial parent, and then petition the court in that jurisdiction for custody. Courts would customarily hear such a case without regard to an existing custody order issued in another jurisdiction. The subsequent passage of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) and the Commonwealth Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (CCCJA) sought to change this circumstance. One of the major goals of the UCCJA is to deter abductions and other unilateral removals of children undertaken to obtain custody awards. The act achieves this goal through the inclusion of a section which bases the exercise of jurisdiction on the conduct of the party seeking relief. The act prohibits the Pennsylvania courts from exercising jurisdiction in a modification case if the petitioner, without consent of the person entitled to custody, has improperly removed the child from the home of the person entitled to custody or has improperly retained the child after a visit. There is an exception to this rule when the court finds that the best interests of the child require that it exercise jurisdiction. With the enactment of the CCCJA, the parent who takes a child across county borders in Pennsylvania in order to relitigate custody faces the same result imposed by the UCCJA. Case law after the enactment of the UCCJA and the CCCJA is examined, and areas of weakness in the laws are identified. Footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Child Abduction; Judicial decisions; Laws and Statutes; Pennsylvania
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.