skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 76922 Find in a Library
Title: Role of the Prosecutor (From Juvenile Justice Standards Symposium, P 550-591, 1979 - See NCJ-76912)
Author(s): E Bridges
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 40
Type: Conference Material
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A symposium presentation and subsequent discussion examine the role of the prosecutor in juvenile proceedings and assess three proposed sets of standards on the subject.
Abstract: The proposed standards are those of the Joint Commission of the Institute for Judicial Administration/American Bar Association (IJA/ABA), the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (NAC), and the Task Force on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Examination of the history of the prosecutor's role shows that the Supreme Court's decision in the Gault case not only established protections for juveniles, but also irreversibly changed the prosecutor's role. However, the increasing number of prosecutors in delinquency proceedings is due not only to the increasingly adversarial nature of the juvenile justice system but also to the increase in juvenile crime. The three proposed sets of standards cover issues ranging from the size and organization of the prosecutor's office to the prosecutor's role in case screening, diversion, adjudication, and disposition. The standards agree that prosecutors should play a significant part in juvenile proceedings and have generally developed criteria which would create an able prosecutorial staff that would contribute to the juvenile justice system. The only flaws in the standards are the attempts to limit prosecutors' authority with respect to representing the State's interests. The two areas involving such limits are the recommendation to permit complainants to file a petition if the prosecution and intake staff decline to do so and the limitations on plea bargaining. The need for probable cause hearings when a juvenile is not detained is also questioned. It is concluded that an adversary system combined with procedural due process will protect the rights of juveniles and the community and may also help in the rehabilitation of juveniles. The subsequent discussion centers on such issues as the problems of rural communities and plea bargaining.
Index Term(s): Juvenile court procedures; Juvenile justice standards; Plea negotiations; Prosecutors; Rights of minors
Note: This document is available on microfiche under NCJ 76912.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.