skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77049 Find in a Library
Title: Gender and Perceived Chances of Arrest
Journal: Social Forces  Volume:59  Issue:4  Dated:(June 1981)  Pages:1182-1199
Author(s): P Richards; C R Tittle
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 18
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Results are reported from a study that examined gender differences in perceived chances of arrest for six familiar types of offenses.
Abstract: Data came from a well-known 1972 survey of the populations aged 15 and older in New Jersey, Iowa, and Oregon. All areas in each of the three States were stratified on the basis of density, and a sample of 1,993 was obtained, using a combination of area probability techniques to select households and random respondents within households. Seventy-four percent of all eligible households were screened and completed interviews were obtained from 77 percent of these, producing a total response rate of 57 percent of all eligible households in the three States. One-hour interviews were conducted with each respondent. The analysis focuses on respondents' estimates of the probability they would be arrested if they were to commit the crimes of minor theft (worth about $5), major theft (worth about $50), marijuana use, illegal gambling, assault, and cheating on income tax. Estimates of risk were arrayed along a 5-point continuum. The variables examined were perceptions of sanction risk, stakes in conformity, cognitive dissonance, visibility, conventionality, information about crime, and information about sanction. Results show that women perceive systematically higher chances of arrest than do men and that differential visibility and differential stakes in conformity seem to be the most promising explanations for these differences. These variables are only modest predictors of overall individual patterns in perceived arrest risks, however. This suggests that much additional work on the patterns and determinants of risk perception is necessary before an adequate picture of more general variation in risk perceptions can be drawn. Tabular data, notes and references are provided.
Index Term(s): Behavioral science research; Deterrence effectiveness; Perception
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.