skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77058 Find in a Library
Title: Prosecution and Defense of RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) and Mail Fraud Cases
Editor(s): M Christensen
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 197
Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Assoc
Washington, DC 20005-1009
Sale Source: American Bar Assoc
Criminal Justice Section
740 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-1009
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The increasing use of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and mail fraud statutes by Federal prosecutors is examined in speeches given to an American Bar Association (ABA) meeting in 1979 and in other materials.
Abstract: Although RICO was intended to combat organized crime, prosecutors have been criticized for using it and mail fraud statutes to reach people who are engaged in economic activities that could not be considered organized crime. The ABA panel discussion on this controversy began with a representative from the Department of Justice (DOJ) defending the use of RICO by Federal prosecutors and claiming that it plays a valuable role in combating white-collar crime and corruption of public officials. RICO was then condemned by an attorney involved in defending individuals accused under RICO. The diverse applications of mail fraud, which are used frequently in conjunction with RICO, were summarized by a former Federal and State prosecutor. He maintained that DOJ policy limits mail fraud indictments to schemes which are directed to defrauding a class of persons or the general public, but that the statute can be applied to many frauds because the offense lies in the mailing. Following a comment by the panel moderator that the decision in U.S. v. Reid found that the scheme to defraud, not the mailing, was critical, a defense attorney emphasized that several court cases have not supported the DOJ's view that the use of the mails can be the gist of the offense. After reviewing other challenges to mail fraud prosecutions, the speaker concluded that the mail fraud statute remains a prosecutorially defined crime and constitutes a dangerous situation. The speakers commented on a simulated RICO case with motions to dismiss counts and answered questions on RICO case with motions to dismiss counts and answered questions on RICO prosecutions. The appendixes contain the text of the RICO statute, a DOJ explanation of RICO (see NCJ 77059), and two articles analyzing RICO and its potential problems. The text of the mail fraud statute and excerpts from the U.S. Attorney's Manual on its uses are included.
Index Term(s): American Bar Association (ABA); Laws and Statutes; Organized crime; Organized Crime Control Act of 1970; Postal crimes; Prosecution; US Department of Justice
Note: Monograph of the Annual Meeting Program of the American Bar Association, Section of Criminal Justice, Dallas, Texas, August 14, 1979.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.