skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77066 Find in a Library
Title: Preliminary Breath Test Concept in Traffic Enforcement (PBT and DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) Enforcement)
Journal: Journal of Police Science and Administration  Volume:9  Issue:1  Dated:(March 1981)  Pages:24-27
Author(s): D Bradel
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 4
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The effectiveness of the preliminary breath test (PBT) in aiding the enforcement of driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) laws is examined.
Abstract: The PBT is an objective roadside blood alcohol content (BAC) chemical test. PBT laws permit police to administer such a test before arresting a driver to determine if there is sufficient evidence for a DWI charge. The preliminary results of the use of PBT's indicate that it is a valuable tool for police in combating the severe drinking-driver problem in this country. PBT's speed the processing time of DWI traffic stops by eliminating the arrest of persons who are not legally under the influence of alcohol. Also, the threat of the widespread use of PBT may have as significant an impact on DWI violators as the actual use of the test. Reliable testing devices are available, and as the state-of-the art progresses, their cost should decrease. For States advocating the enactment and use of PBT laws, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recommends (1) the use of PBT as an alternative or complement to the traditional roadside psychomotor tests, (2) the use of PBT in situations when the issuance of a search warrant would be impractical, (3) the use of PBT only in situations where reasonable grounds exist for believing a driver is under the influence of alcohol, (4) the administration of a PBT as a nonevidential test to be followed by a second evidential implied consent test if justified, and (5) the use of PBT to help expedite the removal of dangerous drinking drivers from the roads. References are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Alcohol consumption analysis; Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Legislation; Police effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.