skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77253 Find in a Library
Title: Comparison of Psychics, Detectives, and Students in the Investigation of Major Crimes
Author(s): N Klyver; M Reiser
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 14
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper describes the results of a replication of Reiser's 1979 study, which focused on the ability of psychics to aid in criminal investigations; two control groups were used in this study to provide empirical reference points.
Abstract: Two teams of psychics or 'sensitives,' four in one group and eight in the other, participated in the study. In addition, the two control groups consisted of 11 college student volunteers and 12 homicide detectives. Four actual murder cases, two solved and two unsolved, were selected for study. Case information was available in all four cases for victim data and in two cases for suspect data. One piece of physical evidence from each crime was sealed in an envelope. The two nonpsychic groups were instructed to take each piece of evidence and attempt to intuit or guess characteristics of both the victim and the suspect in each crime. The psychics worked in two teams and were asked to perform the same task. Most of the psychics generated lengthy discourses with dramatic and confident statements. In contrast, the detective group produced very terse and highly qualified statements. The student groups appeared to feel slightly more at ease with the task than did the detectives. Their statements tended to be lists of information without apparently sensory-derived descriptions. The data generated by each subject were classified into 20 response categories and an additional miscellaneous category. Since the psychic group produced approximately 10 times as much information as either of the two comparison groups, it is more likely by chance alone that their data would produce more useful information. Despite this statistical advantage, the psychics were unable to produce information that was significantly better than the comparison groups. The data provided no support for the theory that psychics could produce investigatively useful information. In addition, the data failed to show that the psychics could produce any information relating to the cases beyond a chance level of expectancy. Independent verification procedures are recommended for cases in which psychics are used. Three tables and three references are provided.
Index Term(s): Crime detection; Criminal investigation units; Psychics; Psychological research; Suspect identification; Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77253

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.