skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77305 Find in a Library
Title: Some Characteristics of the Sentencing Process
Author(s): J J M vanDijk
Corporate Author: Netherlands Ministry of Justice
Research and Documentation Centre
Netherlands
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Netherlands Ministry of Justice
2500 Eh the Hague, Netherlands
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: Findings and recommendations are reported from a sentencing study conducted in the Netherlands to determine on what factors sentencing decisions are based in order to influence judicial decisionmaking.
Abstract: Thousands of criminal files were analyzed by research assistants to determine which characteristics of the case and the offender, as documented in the files, were most closely related to the various judicial decisions. Studies were also conducted at local courts where direct observations were made of the sentencing consistency based upon the determined culpability of the offender. The volume of cases, however, prevents the sentencer from making a detailed examination of the offender's culpability, so that crude and objective indicators of culpability (i.e., the number of offenses, their joint financial consequences, and the number of former convictions). It is only with unique cases that the sentencer appears to depart from routine considerations in determining the sentence. Although each sentencer generally aims at personal consistency and the objective criteria used by all are basically the same, there is a consistent disparity in sentencing among the sentencers. This finding suggests the necessity of sentencing guidelines, which would prompt all sentencers to seek consistency within the same guidelines rather than in their own personal sentencing histories. Eleven references are provided.
Index Term(s): Judicial discretion; Netherlands; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing/Sanctions
Note: Number 37.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77305

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.