skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77310 Find in a Library
Title: Grand Jury Reform - The Colorado Experience
Journal: American Bar Association Journal  Volume:67  Dated:(May 1981)  Pages:568-572
Author(s): H J Bayless
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 5
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes grand jury reform in the State of Colorado, as effected by enactment of a 1977 statute.
Abstract: Grand juries in Colorado now may consist of 12 or 23 members. In a grand jury of 12, a quorum of 9 is necessary to conduct business, and a vote of 9 is necessary to indict, regardless of the number of grand jurors present. The new statute provides that upon empaneling a grand jury, the court shall give to members reasonable, written notice of the various rights and duties of the grand jury. To date, only four Colorado Supreme Court opinions have interpreted sections of the new statute. The most recent case, Colorado v. District Court (1980), dealt with a reporter's right to record all aspects of grand jury proceedings. One of the grand jury's rights which is now explained to new members is the right to call and interrogate witnesses. In addition, the new statute does not mandate that all witnesses appearing before the grand jury must be subpoenaed. Witnesses may appear voluntarily. The legislation also provides that a witness who intends to exercise the fifth amendment privilege may advise the prosecutor in writing rather than appear before the grand jury. The contempt provisions under the new statute have been weakened significantly from prior grand jury statutes. Finally, counsel are permitted to appear with clients testifying before the grand jury.
Index Term(s): Colorado; Grand juries; Investigative powers; Law reform; State laws; Testimony; Witnesses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.