skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77556 Find in a Library
Title: Symposium on the Policies and Legal Theories Underlying the Proposed Federal Criminal Code
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:72  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer 1981)  Pages:381-630
Author(s): Anonymous
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 250
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Symposium papers regarding the proposed Federal Criminal Code touch on extraterritorial jurisdiction, corporate criminal liability, competency to stand trial, culpability provisions, extortion and labor disputes, and sentencing disparity.
Abstract: A brief evaluation of the proposed criminal code is offered, followed by a look at Federal criminal jurisdiction and extraterritorial applications of the Federal criminal law. The simultaneously beneficial and detrimental aspects of corporate conduct are then considered in a study of Section 1617 of Senate Bill 1722, the endangerment offense, which prohibits socially and environmentally harmful corporate activities. Attention then turns to the Senate and House proposed revisions of the Federal Criminal Code with regard to competency to stand trial. Clarification of mens rea, or culpability, provisions of the Federal Criminal Code are also discussed. Congressional efforts to revise the code to include labor-related violence in the Federal crime of extortion are examined next, with the conclusion that the Emmons case decision should hold against proposed revisions. Innovations aimed at the problem of disparate sentencing are the object of the two final studies. The first is a criminological evaluation of sentencing disparities based on empirical studies by a research group. In the second, a judge provides a legal analysis drawing on his practical experience on the Federal bench. Footnotes accompany individual papers.
Index Term(s): Competency to stand trial; Corporate criminal liability; Crime seriousness measures; Criminal intent; Extortion; Federal Code; Judicial discretion; Jurisdiction; Labor relations; Law reform; Penalty severity rating; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform; Strikes; Symposia
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77556

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.