skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77571 Find in a Library
Title: Media in the Courts
Author(s): C A Carter
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 135
Sponsoring Agency: National Ctr for State Courts
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Sale Source: National Ctr for State Courts
Publications Dept
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This monograph reviews the history behind the controversy over cameras in the courtroom, summarizes the major issues involved, and describes the extent to which coverage by electronic and photographic media is allowed in the various States.
Abstract: Noting that the debate over cameras in the courtroom has raged for the better part of the 20th century, the monograph details the American Bar Association's adoption of Canon 35 which had the effect of banning photography in the courtroom and the later recodification which permitted electronic and photographic equipment in the courtroom for limited purposes. The monograph also describes cases involving the use of courtroom photography, such as the murder trial of Harry Washburn in Waco, Tex., State supreme court rulings on camera use in Lyles v. State (Oklahoma), and Colorado Supreme Court hearings concerning Canon 35. A review is given of the evolution of the constitutional issues before the U.S. Supreme Court in Estes v. Texas which involved the constitutionality of televising a criminal trial over the defendant's objection. In addition, the monograph discusses three possible threats to a defendant's right to a fair trial (physical distractions, adverse psychological impact upon trial participants, and prejudicial publicity) and relates these threats to the four conflicting constitutional rights: those of fair trial, privacy, freedom of speech and of the press. The monograph also analyzes the assertion that camera coverage of court proceedings should be allowed, based on the right to a public trial. Finally, evidence is given of changing attitudes about electronic and photographic media coverage. Such evidence includes the Conference of Chief Justices' adoption of an amendment to Canon 3 A(7) of the Code of Judicial Conduct to allow limited electronic and photographic media coverage of judicial proceedings and the fact that 27 State courts now permit electronic and photographic coverage of certain judicial proceedings. A total of 236 notes are given. Part II describes the history and nature of guidelines in those States allowing electronic and photographic media coverage on both a permanent and an experimental basis. The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Chandler v. Florida on January 26, 1981, is appended. In a unanimous opinion, the Court ruled that television coverage of a criminal proceeding does not automatically violate a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial despite a defendant's objection to the coverage. Reports of recent (December 1980 - January 1981) State actions in Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, and New York are also appended.
Index Term(s): Alabama; Alaska; American Bar Association (ABA); Arizona; California; Colorado; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Florida; Georgia (USA); Idaho; Judicial decisions; Louisiana; Maryland; Massachusetts; Media coverage; Minnesota; Montana; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Pennsylvania; Photography; State supreme courts; Television programming; Tennessee; Texas; Trial procedures; US Supreme Court; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.