skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77609 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Diversion of Felony Arrests - An Experiment in Pretrial Intervention - An Evaluation of the Court Employment Project - Summary Report
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Project Director: S H Baker
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 76
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Vera Institute of Justice
New York, NY 10279
Grant Number: 76-NI-99-0040
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This summary report presents the findings of a 1977-79 evaluation of the Court Employment Project (CEP) in New York City, the Nation's first pretrial diversion program, designed to divert young offenders from the stigma of conviction.
Abstract: CEP used administrative separation and independent screening of court cases to identify appropriate defendants and to advocate for their diversion. It also provided diverted defendants with employment and other manpower services and negotiated with prosecutors to agree to dismiss charges and seal official records for defendants who successfully participated in the project's services. To measure CEP's impact, the Vera Institute designed an experimental study with the following major characteristics: the concurrent and random assignment of defendants, screened as eligible for pretrial diversion, to an experimental group (diverted) and to a control group (normally processed in the court); a research population large enough to permit adequate analysis of program impact (666 subjects); a followup period of at least 1 year after intake for all experimental and control group members, including program dropouts; and an extensive data base on all research subjects. The study found that pretrial diversion was an alternative to normal court processing but that it was not typically an alternative to full prosecution, criminal conviction, or official sanction or supervision because almost half the diverted defendants would not have been prosecuted and the rest would have had their cases disposed of leniently. Also, the project was not able to make a meaningful difference in the vocational status of those who were diverted, in their lifestyles, or in the likelihood of their future involvement in the criminal justice system. The study suggests that CEP did not have a substantial impact on dispositions in 1977 because dismissal rates, in cases of the kind diverted, were already high in the New York City criminal courts. Other explanations of the CEP evaluation findings are also detailed. Nineteen footnotes are given. Descriptions of the CEP and of the evaluation are appended; a bibliography of about 60 references is included.
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Diversion programs; Evaluation; Judicial diversion; National Institute of Justice (NIJ); New York; Pretrial intervention; Prosecutorial diversion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77609

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.