skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 077622     Find in a Library
  Title: Police Informant
  Corporate Author: Louisiana State Penitentiary
United States of America
  Journal: Angolite  Dated:(November/December 1980)  Pages:25-46
  Date Published: 1980
  Page Count: 22
  Annotation: The pros and cons of the use of police informants to counter drug trafficking and terrorism are examined.
  Abstract: The threat of international terrorism and the runaway growth of illicit drug trafficking over the past 20 years have forced law enforcement agencies to expand their use of informants to unprecedented levels. An informant is generally someone who has contacted the criminal justice system because of a criminal lifestyle, but is granted immunity from appropriate criminal justice sanctions in return for giving the police information about persons in the criminal underworld or participating with undercover police in illicit drug transactions that produce arrests of the unwitting participants. Although in theory the police maintain that informants are not made immune from prosecution should they break the law in the course of their informant career, in practice, much of the lawbreaking of the informant is overlooked in the interest of maintaining him/her as a valuable information source. Informants will often continue as drug users and even pushers, with their immunity from prosecution being rationalized as necessary to establish their credibility in the drug network. Further, the informant is free to supply or withhold information from the police to serve his/her own interests in the illicit drug network, so that enemies are given over to the police, while the informant's own network of profit or drug use is protected. The expansion of the informant system not only maintains a growing number of criminals in the criminal underworld and outside rehabilitative influences, but also increases a system whereby citizens' privacy is more easily invaded by and the police become increasingly involved in creating the scenarios of criminal behavior.
  Index Term(s): Informants ; Right of privacy ; Investigative powers ; Drug law enforcement ; Counter-terrorism tactics ; Counter-terrorism intelligence
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77622

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.