skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77839 Find in a Library
Title: American Prison - A Tinderbox
Journal: New York Times Magazine  Dated:(March 8, 1981)  Pages:26-27,29,31,33-35,56-58,60-61
Author(s): J Lieber
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 9
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The causes and dangers of overcrowding in U.S. prisons are discussed, and ways of reducing inmate populations are considered. Facility conditions in Ohio's maximum security prison at Lucasville, at Indiana State Prison in Michigan City, and other prisons illustrate the effects of overcrowding.
Abstract: Prison riots, such as the one at the New Mexico State Prison at Santa Fe, could erupt at any one of the major prisons in the country because of severe overcrowding. Between 1973 and 1981, the State and Federal prison population has increased from 196,000 to more than 314,000 -- the sharpest rise in history. One cause of the increase has been the public's strong reaction to apparent increases in crime and their encouragement of tougher sentences. Another has been the steady emptying of mental hospitals, whose former patients often spill into criminal court. However, corrections administrators and analysts increasingly point to the principal factor as the change being made in procedures for handing out criminal punishment. Many State legislatures are eliminating the discretionary powers of judges and parole boards by mandating minimum prison terms. The results are illustrated at the Indiana State Prison at Michigan City, for example, where about 40 percent of the new prison population is made up of persons convicted of minor crimes and where burglars and rapists are serving 100 percent more time than formerly. By last fall, the State prison population exceeded its own rated capacity figure by 30 percent. In several areas, sentencing alternatives are being reintroduced to reduce populations. In Wilmington, Del., for instance, those convicted of less serious crimes are often fined rather than imprisoned, and in Quincy, Mass., a restitution program which helps offenders find jobs has been established. This program, which is operated in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce, produces about $200,000 in restitution payments each year for theft, personal injury, or property damage. Some experts believe that a return to discretionary sentencing may be necessary to reduce overcrowding in prisons. Photographs are included. A reference list is not provided.
Index Term(s): Correctional institutions (adult); Correctional reform; Facility conditions; Fear of crime; Inmate attitudes; Inmate grievances; Legislation; Overcrowding; Prison disorders; Public Attitudes/Opinion; Riot causes; Riot prevention
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77839

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.