skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77841 Find in a Library
Title: Kansas Diversion - Defendant's Remedies and Prosecutorial Opportunities
Journal: Washburn Law Journal  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:(1981)  Pages:344-374
Author(s): J B Cox
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 31
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Diversion under Kansas law is described and critiqued.
Abstract: In 1978, the Kansas Legislature made diversion available as an alternative to institutionalization. Under the diversion statute, each district and county attorney must promulgate written policies and guidelines for a diversion program and must inform each defendant of its availability. A defendant can be diverted at any time after charging and prior to conviction. Initially, the defendant must indicate to the prosecutor he/she wants to be diverted. The prosecutor then considers certain factors which would help him/her determine if diversion would be in the interest of justice and would benefit the defendant and the community. If the prosecutor offers diversion and the defendant has consented to the conditions of diversion, the court must stay further proceedings. If the prosecutor finds the defendant has successfully completed his/her diversion, the prosecutor requests that the court dismiss the charges, and the court is required to do so. The courts should be given the right to review the prosecutor's denial of diversion in a limited way, not in deference to the defendant, but to ensure the legality of the decision. Diversion may allow that an innocent defendant be subjected to the control of the criminal justice system, but defense counsel can lessen that risk to the client by using statutory discovery or informal efforts to determine whether the defendant is provably guilty before consenting to diversion. Participation in community corrections funding would enable the prosecutor to be creative and flexible in determining eligibility for the conditions of diversion. A total of 254 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions; Kansas; Prosecutorial discretion; Prosecutorial diversion; Rights of the accused; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.