skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77855 Find in a Library
Title: Eyewitness Accuracy and Confidence - Can We Infer Anything About Their Relationship?
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:4  Issue:4  Dated:special issue (1980)  Pages:243-260
Author(s): K A Deffenbacher
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 18
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Employing witnesses' level of confidence in their testimony as one of five criteria in deciding the trustworthiness of eyewitness testimony is not supported by a review of 43 separate assessments of the accuracy/confidence relation in eye- and earwitnesses.
Abstract: A recent laboratory study has shown that juror perceptions of witness confidence account for 50 percent of the variance in juror judgments as to witness accuracy. Yet statistics support the notion that the predictability of accuracy from overtly expressed confidence varies directly with the degree of optimality of information processing conditions during encoding of the witnessed event, memory storage, and testing of the witnesses' memory. Low optimal conditions, those mitigating against the likelihood of highly reliable testimony, typically result in a zero correlation of confidence and accuracy. Statistics were gleaned from some 25 studies reporting 43 separate assessments of the accuracy and confidence relation in eye- and earwitnesses. Six of seven forensically relevant laboratory studies exhibit significant positive correlations of confidence and accuracy, using the arbitrary criterion of 70 percent or greater accuracy to define high optimal conditions. However, no clear criteria exist for distinguishing post hoc high from low optimal witnessing conditions in any particular real-life situation. Hence the judiciary should cease their reliance on witness confidence as an index of witness accuracy. Footnotes, tables, reference notes, and 34 references are included. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Accountability; Suspect identification; Witnesses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.