skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77858 Find in a Library
Title: Influence of Expert Testimony Regarding Eyewitness Accuracy on Jury Decisions
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:4  Issue:4  Dated:special ssue (1980)  Pages:287-296
Author(s): H M Hosch; E L Beck; P McIntyre
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: University of Texas at El Paso
El Paso, TX 79968
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A two-phase study was conducted to determine the influence of expert testimony on jurors' belief in the reliability of eyewitnesses.
Abstract: In the first phase of the experiment, 24 community residents served as jurors on four six-person juries. A burglary case was tried in 120 District Court, El Paso, Tex. Two juries heard all the evidence including the expert testimony of a psychologist, and the other two juries heard all of the testimony except that of the psychologist. During the second phase, 24 student jurors constituting 4 6-person juries viewed a videotape of the trial. Two of these juries saw the entire proceeding including the expert testimony, and the remaining two saw all but the expert testimony. All juries acquitted the defendant; however, those who heard the expert testimony significantly lowered their judgments of the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness identification as well as its overall importance to the trial. Further, those juries that heard the expert testimony spent a significantly longer time discussing eyewitness identification as well as other relevant evidence. No differences between community residents and college student juries were obtained. Tabular data and 21 references are included. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Accountability; Expert witnesses; Jury decisionmaking; Testimony; Witnesses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77858

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.