skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77871 Find in a Library
Title: From Crime to Court
Corporate Author: South Carolina Educational Television Network
United States of America

South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
United States of America
Project Director: H T Kauthen; T Grossboll
Date Published: 1966
Sponsoring Agency: South Carolina Educational Television Network
Columbia, SC 29205
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
Columbia, SC 29210
Format: Film
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina and a judge discuss rules of evidence in court, with attention to the hearsay rule, dying declarations, and crimes of moral turpitude.
Abstract: The hearsay rule states that testimony given as to the facts in a case must come from a person who has seen, heard, tasted, or smelled the evidence. For example, in most cases a witness cannot testify about an event he was told about by another person; this would be hearsay evidence and not admissible in court. One exception to the hearsay rule is the dying declaration, in which the dying person has accused someone of a crime. Before this evidence can be submitted to the court, three requirements must be met: the statement must be related to the case, the person making the statement must be dying and later dead, the the dying person must believe he is dying. Examples of dying declarations that would be acceptable as evidence are given. In addition, rules of evidence applicable to crimes of moral turpitude, and crimes at common law such as murder, burglary, or rape, are discussed. For example, in prosecuting such crimes, attorneys will attempt to attack the defendant's credibility by revealing their prior convictions. However, prosecutors cannot present direct evidence of unrelated crimes previously committed by the defendant except in cases where the crimes were closely linked in time and circumstances and malice was evident. Other rules of evidence discussed deal with prejudicial statements, admissibility of crime scene sketches, and the use of notes in court.
Index Term(s): Burden of proof; Confessions; Hearsay evidence; Rules of evidence
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. This is a 16mm black and white film. It is 38 minutes in length.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.