skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77886 Find in a Library
Title: Ethical Issues for Psychologists in Court Settings (From Who Is the Client, P 43-62, 1980, John Monahan, ed. - See NCJ-77884)
Author(s): E A Fersch
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: American Psychological Assoc
Washington, DC 20002-4242
Sale Source: American Psychological Assoc
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4242
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper discusses some ethical problems facing psychologists serving in courts that are caused by conflicting goals.
Abstract: The conflict of interests between courts and psychologists causes ethical problems focusing on representations of the effectiveness of psychological services, representations of the psychologist's competence, confidentiality, responsibility to the client, and design and use of research. For example, in matters of confidentiality, a court-appointed psychologist has a duty to report harmful acts planned by the defendant. Here the ethical dilemma is increased by the great difficulty in predicting dangerousness to an individual and to society. Psychologists must be clear as to what role they are performing and aware of the limitations of that role and of the conflicts it raises. Furthermore, psychologists should challenge the traditions which require them to perform certain roles and functions. Three correctional models are discussed: traditional, reform, and rethinking as well as questions of public policy and future roles of psychologists in court settings. Relevant studies are examined. Notes and over 80 references are included.
Index Term(s): Professional conduct and ethics; Psychologists
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77886

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.