skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77917 Find in a Library
Title: California Rent-a-judge Experiment - Constitutional and Policy Considerations of Pay-as-you-go Courts
Journal: Harvard Law Review  Volume:94  Issue:7  Dated:(May 1981)  Pages:1592-1615
Author(s): Anonymous
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 24
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The use of referees, as presented in one California statute, has several constitutional and institutional problems that make it an unsatisfactory solution to the problem of overcrowded dockets and, hence, an unsuitable model for others to follow.
Abstract: In California, a reference procedure allows litigants to bypass the formal court system; cases are tried before a referee selected and paid by the litigants and empowered by statute to enter decisions having the finality of trial court JUDGMENTS. Advantages of full reference trials include speed, the freedom to select the referee who has particular experience or expertise in the subject matter of the litigation, the secrecy of private hearings, and the potential to avoid the sort of compromise verdict that arbitration can produce. Finally, referee trials may contribute to a reduction in the total dispute-resolution cost to society. However, trials conducted by privately paid judges raise issues of equal protection and due process. The use of referees paid by the parties, in effect, creates two classes of litigants: the wealthy who can afford the price of a referee and the poorer who cannot. Moreover, the use of referees may hinder the future development of the law to allow possibly important public issues to be litigated in a completely private context. A chart presents the range of possible reference procedures by State; 119 footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Alternative dispute settlement; Arbitration; California; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Designated judges; Judge selection; Judicial conduct and ethics; Judicial decisions; Mediation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77917

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.