skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 77994 Find in a Library
Title: Sex Differences in Bystander Intervention in a Theft
Journal: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  Volume:37  Issue:11  Dated:(1979)  Pages:2110-2120
Author(s): W Austin
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: Russell Sage Foundation
New York, NY 10065
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Several experiments were performed to determine how a bystander's likelihood of intervening in a theft was affected by the amount of loss to the victim and the sex of the thief, the victim, and the bystander.
Abstract: The bystanders selected as study subjects were all college students who were unaware that the thefts were simulations. The general procedure was similar for all the studies. The subjects were relaxing, usually reading, and seated by themselves in a corridor of a classroom building. One experimenter, who served as the potential victim, approached the bystander subject and secured the bystander's verbal commitment to watch some personal belongings. The experimenter then set several objects near the bystander. Objects ranged from items such as folders which had low value to items such as an electronic calculator which had high value. The first experimenter then moved to a distant location to record the subject's responses as a second experimenter, who served as the thief, approached, paused to examine the articles, and then conspicuously took them. The study's dependent variable was the percentage of subjects who intervened to stop the theft. Subjects were also administered an open-ended questionnaire regarding their awareness of the theft, their reaction, and reasons for their action or inaction. Results showed that a high percentage of females intervened regardless of the amount of potential loss, whereas males generally helped only when the harm to the victim was high. Female victims received significantly more aid while the thief's sex had no effect. Results supported the usefulness of an interactionist approach to the question of how individual variables and situational variables affect prosocial action. Tables, footnotes, and 22 references are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Individual behavior; Psychological research; Studies; Theft offenses; Witness intervention in crime
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=77994

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.