skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 78256 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of a Campaign To Reduce Car Thefts (From Designing Out Crime, P 113-125, 1980, R V G Clarke and P Mayhew, ed. - See NCJ-78253)
Author(s): D Riley
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Pendragon House, Inc
Campbell, CA 95008
Sale Source: Pendragon House, Inc
2898 Joseph Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This British evaluation, conducted within the Home Office Research Unit, assesses the impact of a 1979 Central Office of Information advertising campaign on police autocrime statistics and vehicle security.
Abstract: The evaluation used three measures of campaign effectiveness: (1) the number of recorded offenses of thefts of and from motor vehicles which were obtained for police forces within the campaign and control areas for the campaign and precampaign periods, (2) detailed information on police crime reports recording the theft of a motor vehicle, and (3) vehicle security checks conducted by police officers on parked cars in January 1979 before the campaign began and in March 1979 at the end of the campaign. The evaluation findings suggest that the 1979 autocrime campaign met with little success either in achieving improvements in car-locking behavior or in reducing the number of recorded car thefts. It is suggested that the campaign failed to produce discernible improvements in vehicle security for two reasons. First, the campaign failed to produce large enough changes in perception of risk either generally or in relation to specific parking situations. Further, the campaign may have done little to overcome other beliefs supporting noncompliance with its recommendations. Tabular data and footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Crime prevention measures; England; Evaluation; Motor Vehicle Theft
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=78256

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.