skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78471 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Matrix System for Custody Classifications and Supervision (From Classification, P 13-34, 1981 - See NCJ-78470)
Author(s): T G Toombs
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 22
Sponsoring Agency: American Correctional Assoc
Alexandria, VA 22314
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source: American Correctional Assoc
206 N. Washington St., Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper presents the Custody/Supervision Level Matrix developed by the Oregon Corrections Division to protect correctional workers' use of discretionary power, reduce disparity in corrections, and increase certainty when dealing with probationers and parolees.
Abstract: The objective was to develop a systematic method of establishing custody ratings and levels of supervision for inmates, parolees, probationers, and other clients of the corrections division who were enrolled in the State's work release program. To set release dates the matrix uses the Criminal History Risk Assessment Score (CHRS) and the Offense Severity Rating Scale (OSRS). The CHRS ranges from 0 to 11 (the lower the number, the higher the risk). The OSRS classifies all felonies into seven categories (the higher the number, the more serious the offense). Procedural provisions allow the parole board to deviate upward or downward, taking into consideration aggravating or mitigating circumstances related to the crime. Factors bearing on classification decisions (developed as a result of a correctional staff survey) include the nature of the offense, criminal history pattern, length of time to release, demonstrated behavior patterns, and drug/alcohol problems. Examples of how the matrix works and charts used in the matrix are included.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; Corrections management; Dangerousness; Discretionary decisions; Inmate classification; Oregon; Probation or parole decisionmaking
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.