skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78472 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Wisconsin Case Classification/Staff Deployment Project - A Two-year Follow-up Report (From Classification, P 35-72, 1981 - See NCJ-78470)
Author(s): S C Baird; R C Heinz; B J Bemus
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 37
Sponsoring Agency: American Correctional Assoc
Alexandria, VA 22314
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
US Dept of Justice
Washington, DC 20531
Wisconsin Council on Criminal Justice
Madison, WI 53702
Sale Source: American Correctional Assoc
206 N. Washington St., Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This evaluation of the Wisconsin Bureau of Community Corrections' system for the classification of probationers and parolees, conducted 2 years after the system's initiation, shows that its success was due to an emphasis on implementation by the line staff.
Abstract: The Wisconsin system assigns clients to maximum, medium, or minimum supervision using risk scales based on such factors as rules violations, arrests, misdemeanor or felony convictions, and revocations. To evaluate the system, the State's southern region (the first area in which the classification process has been fully implemented) was compared with the control eastern region. Clients from both regions were matched on an individual basis. Findings showed that criminal activity has declined significantly in the high risk/high need group when required contacts (with case workers) have been increased. At the same time, decreasing contacts with low risk/low need clients has had no perceivable adverse effects. The identification of clients may help better allocate resources since the reductions in arrests, new convictions, and revocations in high risk/high need clients will generate considerate savings and help control increases in jail and prison populations. The system also makes it possible to ascertain the total workload of each probation and parole office by establishing time requirements for each supervision level, as well as for all other agency functions. Management can then allocate agent positions on a work load rather than a case load basis. Budget development and the management information system are discussed. Statistical data, classification instruments, case processing procedures, and three references are appended.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; Corrections management; Follow-up contacts; Inmate classification; Management Information Systems; Probation or parole services; Program evaluation; Psychological evaluation; Treatment offender matching; Wisconsin
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.