skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78473 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Risk Assessment, Classification, and Security Level Designation (From Classification, P 73-83, 1981 - See NCJ-78470)
Author(s): K E Larimore; B Hutchinson
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: American Correctional Assoc
Alexandria, VA 22314
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source: American Correctional Assoc
206 N. Washington St., Suite 200
Alexandria, VA 22314
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper presents the inmate classification system proposed by the Minnesota Department of Corrections to ensure adequate security levels for offenders convicted of 'person-type' or 'professional' offenses.
Abstract: The classification system seeks to minimize risk to the public and to other inmates and staff, as well as the security risk (i.e., the possibility that an inmate may escape, fail to return after authorized temporary leave, or obtain escape paraphernalia such as ropes). Other goals of the system include minimizing institutional disruption, classifying offenders into lowest possible security levels, and maximizing fairness and inmate understanding of the system. To this end, the parole board uses a matrix system which keys off the severity of inmates' offenses and their scores on a risk of failure index. Inmates spend 50 percent of their incarceration in their initial risk category and then become eligible for lower security levels. Some inmates (e.g., those convicted of multiple homicides) are excluded from the system. Furthermore, the superintendents of a medium or minimum security institution may refuse to accept eligible inmates; such refusal must be made in writing and the reasons documented. Inmates have a right to appeal the decisions. A computer simulation to test the system is briefly discussed. Two footnotes are included.
Index Term(s): Corrections internal security; Dangerousness; Inmate classification; Minnesota; Offense classification
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.