skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78560 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of Prosecutor/Public Defender Interaction on Sentencing An Exploratory Typology
Journal: Criminal Justice Review  Volume:5  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1980)  Pages:43-53
Author(s): M G Gertz
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 12
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The impact of the prosecutor-public defender relationship on a court's sentencing is examined, and the process of building a typology that indicates the importance of the interaction is begun.
Abstract: Three courts with differing prosecutor-public defender relationships were studied. It was hypothesized that in cooperative, friendly, team-oriented courtroom communities, more charges would be dropped; convictions would be for less serious charges than originally imposed; case disposition would take a shorter time; and fewer people would opt for trials than in uncooperative, hostile, adversary-oriented courts. The overall impact was posited to be extreme sentences in uncooperative courts and medium sentences in cooperative courts. The findings generally supported the propositions, but with exceptions. Extreme sentences may be the result of an uncooperative relationship between the prosecutor and public defender. The use of plea bargaining as the chief method of disposing of cases is a reflection of the working relationship between the prosecutor and the public defender. The length of time needed to dispose of cases was much shorter in team-oriented courts, while having many charges dropped was more likely to produce a lighter sentence in a friendly court atmosphere; however, convictions on reduced charges were less frequent in cooperative courts, and their impact was greater in uncooperative courts. Willingness to go to trial, obviously related to the time taken to clear a case, was more common in uncooperative than in cooperative courts. Future research should focus on clearer descriptions and analyses of interacting court relationships. The most accurate explanations of sentencing will probably be a summary of all important interacting patterns. Tabular data from the study are provided, and four notes and seven references are listed. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Interpersonal relations; Plea negotiations; Prosecutors; Public defenders; Research; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.