skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78657 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Stop and Frisk - An Historical and Empirical Assessment (From Essays on the Theory and Practice of Criminal Justice, P 41-90, 1977, by Robert M Rich - See NCJ-78656)
Author(s): W F McDonald
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 34
Sponsoring Agency: University Press of America
Lanham, MD 20706
Sale Source: University Press of America
Marketing Director
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Following a review of the history of the debate on police 'stop and frisk' powers, empirical findings related to opposing claims in the debate are examined.
Abstract: In its 1968 decision in Terry v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police could stop and frisk a citizen based on 'reasonable suspicion' that a crime had been committed. This departed from the time-honored standard of 'probable cause.' To examine the effects of police stop and frisk practices, empirical research was conducted in 1972, involving about 500 hours of accompanying police on patrol to observe their use of stop and frisk practices. Evidence indicates that anticipated law enforcement benefits have not been realized from the broader police powers to stop and frisk. The crimes most affected by the practice are burglary, petit larceny, vandalism, marihuana possession, and possession of other drugs, while the more serious crimes of murder, rape, and robbery are not affected. Contrary to predictions that police would no longer use legal subterfuges to detain and frisk a person on the street, police still make use of the charges of disorderly conduct, vagrancy, loitering, curfew violations, and arrests on suspicion, along with vehicle stops for minor traffic violations. However, the feared expansion of police intrusion into citizen privacy, particularly in black communities, has not occurred. An officer on an 8-hour shift rarely uses stop and frisk practices. Thus, neither side in the debate has grounds for its support or disagreement with current stop and frisk practices. A total of 89 notes are listed, and tabular data from the study are provided.
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions; Legal research; Police legal limitations; Right of privacy; Search and seizure; Search and seizure laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.