skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 78749 Find in a Library
Title: Study of Informers in England
Journal: Criminal Law Review  Dated:(March 1980)  Pages:136-146
Author(s): E Oscapella
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 11
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: The informer's role in criminal investigations in England is examined.
Abstract: While police reports in specific cases do not generally acknowledge the use of informers, police readily admit that many cases could not be solved without the aid of informers. The continued use of informers greatly depends upon their anonymity, because a practice of disclosure could endanger an informer's life. However, this anonymity or secrecy even regarding the use of an informer could jeopardize an accused's defense to the point of affecting trial outcome. This potential circumstance has caused both the Court of Appeal and the Home Office to exhort the police and prosecution not to withhold the fact of an informer's involvement where disclosure might have a bearing on the outcome of the case. Nevertheless, judicial decisions have shown the courts's reluctance to force disclosure of an informer's identity unless it is clearly necessary or could help to establish the defendant's innocence. The clearest circumstance where the secrecy of an informer's role could jeopardize a defense is when an informer acts as an agent of 'entrapment' for the defendant. This is particularly questionable when the informer is himself an operative in the criminal world. A number of recent cases sought to alleviate the accused's plight by excluding evidence obtained through entrapment. The Home Office has provided general guidelines on the use of informer participants, but the only sanction for their breach is internal discipline, a sanction that can only be applied against police officers, not informers. The greatest potential for curbing abuses in the use of informers appears to be improved control by senior police officials over the conduct of informer dealings. In each case, the benefit achieved must be weighed against the costs in public trust and the interests of justice encompassed in the rights of defendants. A total of 46 notes are listed.
Index Term(s): England; Entrapment; Informants; Rights of the accused
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=78749

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.