skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 78854 Find in a Library
Title: Standing Rules and the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Treble Damage Action (From Techniques in the Investigation and Prosecution of Organized Crime - Materials on RICO, P 533-573, 1980, G. Robert Blakey, ed. - See NCJ-78839)
Author(s): V Seiling
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 41
Document: PDF
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Court standing rules for treble damage antitrust suits are assessed in relation to their relevance to treble damage suits under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Abstract: RICO provides for private treble damage actions for 'any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter...' This section is closely patterned after section 4 of the Clayton Act, which creates a private treble damage action for any person injured in 'business or property' by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws. The Federal courts severely limit the number of private plaintiffs in the antitrust field through the enforcement of stringent standing rules. Under the rules, standing to prospective plaintiffs is often denied because the recoveries sought are deemed duplicative, ruinous, speculative, or windfall. Further, to establish standing, an antitrust plaintiff must show two elements: an injury to his/her 'business or property' and that the injury was 'by reason of' a violation of the antitrust laws. To date, the antitrust standing rules have not been applied to RICO treble damage actions. They should not be applied in the future, because the antitrust laws differ markedly in purpose and focus, and the policies and reasons that prompted development of the antitrust standing rules are not found behind RICO. While the antitrust laws have the primary purpose of preserving economic competition in legitimate economic enterprises, RICO aims at providing financial damages that will cripple or terminate an illegitimate enterprise seeking to infiltrate legitimate business. There is no overriding policy for protecting the economic competitive capacity of defendants as there is in antitrust action. A total of 199 footnotes are listed.
Index Term(s): Antitrust offenses; Civil proceedings; Comparative analysis; Court rules; Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act
Note: Available in microfiche from NCJRS as NCJ-78839.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=78854

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.