skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 78870 Find in a Library
Title: Mitigation of Sentence in Order To Deter?
Journal: Monash University Law Review  Volume:6  Dated:(June 1980)  Pages:268-293
Author(s): L Sebba
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 26
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: Studies which examine the effect of severity of punishment on crime deterrence are reviewed.
Abstract: The general pattern of study findings is that the imposition of harsher sentences has either no effect on the rate of recidivism, or it has an adverse effect. This emerges from the literature reviewed by Martinson, Gibbs, and Greenberg, and is confirmed by such sophisticated studies as those of Gottfredson et al. and Beck and Hoffman. The most frequently offered explanation for this finding is that harsh sentences, and in particular prolonged terms of imprisonment, have the harmful effect of stigmatizing the offender and internalizing the norms and values of the prison subculture, rendering the offender virtually incapable of reintegration into society. Another explanation is that when a prisoner has been in prison for some months, he/she becomes dulled to its conditions, such that the length of time under such conditions is not experienced as more severe punishment. Thus, the evidence suggests that severe sentences neither increase the likelihood that the offender on whom the punishment is imposed will be deterred from further crime, nor, because of the probable adverse effects of increasing severity on certainty of punishment (studies show that certainty of punishment tends to decrease with an increase in severity of punishment, perhaps because of a greater reluctance to convict under harsher penalties), do they result in an enhanced deterrent effect on the potential offender. It thus seems possible that in some situations deterrence is more likely to be achieved by reducing penalties and increasing the certainty of punishment, rather than by increasing penalties. A total of 163 footnotes are listed.
Index Term(s): Deterrence; Deterrence effectiveness; Effects of imprisonment; Literature reviews; Punishment
Note: This article is based upon a paper which was presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden, August 1978.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=78870

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.