skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 080298     Find in a Library
Title: Is the Evidence in on the Exclusionary Rule?
Author(s): W A Geller
  Journal: American Bar Association Journal  Volume:67  Dated:(December 1981)  Pages:1642-1645
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 4
  Annotation: Experimental bases and possible approaches for determining the impact of the exclusionary rule in deterring police privacy abuses and affecting public attitudes toward crime and the criminal justice system are discussed.
Abstract: Arguments for and against the use of the exclusionary rule, which forbids the introduction at trial of evidence obtained illegally, have been based more on subjective perceptions and philosophical outlooks than empirical evidence on the impact of the rule. Although the primary intent of the exclusionary rule is to deter police abuse of citizen privacy rights, empirical investigations have not been able to assess the rule's utility in this regard because of researchers' inability to measure directly police search and seizure practices prior to the Supreme Court's imposition of the rule on the States in 1961. Following any eventual nationwide modification or abandonment of the rule, it might be possible to conduct an empirical 'before-after' test of the effect on police performance of altering the rule. Insight might also be gained into the effect of revising the rule if it were experimentally retained for some jurisdictions and changed for others. Also, other strategies for deterring police privacy abuses might be tested for their effectiveness. A General Accounting Office study of the impact of the exclusionary rule on Federal criminal prosecutions showed that illegal searches and seizures accounted for .4 percent of the cases U.S. attorneys declined to accept for prosecution and accounted for about .7 percent of the cases dismissed after prosecution had begun. Studies of the impact of the exclusionary rule in State and local criminal cases show a similar low percentage of cases refused or dismissed because of the exclusionary rule. Empirical evidence as yet does not provide solid ground for either advocates or opponents of the rule.
Index Term(s): Search and seizure laws ; Police legal limitations ; Research methods ; Exclusionary rule ; Deterrence effectiveness
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.