skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 82512 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Review of the Submissions on the Government White Paper on Young Offenders
Author(s): J Matthews
Corporate Author: National Assoc for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO)
United Kingdom
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: National Assoc for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO)
London, SW9 0PU
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Comments from various organizations pertaining to the British Government's White Paper on Young Offenders are reviewed.
Abstract: Comments from the 14 organizations considered indicate a general feeling of disappointment and of opportunities missed in the paper. Much of the response focused on proposals for juvenile offenders (those under age 17). The proposals are as follows: (1) where a juvenile already in the care of a local authority as an offender is found guilty of a further imprisonable offense, power should be given the court to add a residential care order (RCO), with the effect that for a fixed period not exceeding 6 months the juvenile is not allowed to remain at home; (2) the detention center should be retained for male offenders aged 14 and 17, but with shorter maximum and minimum periods of detention; (3) the courts should have power to impose medium term sentences of custody on offenders aged 15 or 16 (now liable to be sentenced to borstal training); (4) the court should be able, on the recommendation of the supervising officer, to specify the program of activities a juvenile undertakes in the community; (5) probation and aftercare committees should have the power to provide intermediate treatment facilities, consistent with proper coordination of local arrangements; (6) the juvenile courts should be able to impose community service orders on offenders aged 16; and (7) there should be a clarification and strengthening of the measures which enable the courts to make parents pay the fines of juveniles or to enter into recognizances. Organizations leveled various criticisms at these proposals.
Index Term(s): Correctional reform; England; Foreign juvenile justice systems; Juvenile justice planning; Sentencing reform; Youthful offenders
Note: National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders Briefing, (September 1981)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=82512

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.