skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 82516 Find in a Library
Title: Criminal Policy Aspects of the Judicial Treatment of Mentally Abnormal Offenders in Austria
Journal: Archiv fuer kriminologie  Volume:168  Issue:3-4  Dated:(September-October 1981)  Pages:106-119
Author(s): K Probst
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 14
Format: Article
Language: German
Country: West Germany (Former)
Annotation: New laws governing the treatment of mentally ill offenders and the problematic role of the psychiatric expert in the Austrian legal system are outlined.
Abstract: Since 1975 a number of laws have been passed in Austria to define precisely what constitutes mental incompetence and what measures should be taken to treat mentally ill offenders. With very mentally disturbed or mentally deficient offenders culpability or its lack can be determined, but ascertaining the extent of culpability for other types of mental disturbances is more difficult. The difficulties are alleviated somewhat by a special series of regulations for individuals who are less than mentally disturbed but still 'psychologically abnormal.' Unfortunately, the meaning of the latter term is unclear. It is virtually impossible for a psychiatrist to determine whether an offender could have controlled his impulse to commit an offense. Any expert opinion can only consist of a list of subjectively observed states of consciousness. Since the passage of the exculpation norms in 1975, twice as many mentally incompetent offenders as previously have been excused from penalties, probably because there are now better means of placing mentally incompetent offenders in treatment instead of incarcerating them for protection of society. However, psychopaths and neurotics not far outside the range of the normal are to be placed in medical treatment only if they have exacerbated their conditions through drug use. Thus, 'mild' mental disturbances are classified as mental illness but not as legal grounds for mental incompetence. In general, the fact that psychiatric and legal definitions of mental incompetence diverge remains one of the serious problems in dealing with mentally ill offenders. The mistaken belief of the public that psychiatry and justice can always reach the right decision must be altered. Notes are supplied.
Index Term(s): Criminal responsibility; Emotionally disturbed delinquents; Germany; Insanity defense; Laws and Statutes; Mentally ill offenders; Psychopaths
Note: Talk given at the Workshop on Sex Crime, April 12, 1980 in Graz, Austria for the Professional Organization of Forensic Psychiatry and Neurology.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=82516

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.