skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 89835 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Defining the Role of the Victim in Criminal Prosecution
Journal: Mississippi Law Journal  Volume:52  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1982)  Pages:515-561
Author(s): A S Goldstein
Corporate Author: Yale Law Journal
United States of America
Date Published: 1982
Page Count: 47
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Yale Law Journal
New Haven, CT 06520
Grant Number: 78-NI-AX-0017
Dataset: DATASET 1
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper considers the impact of the victims' movement, the revival of restitution, and providing 'standing' for the victim at various stages in case processing.
Abstract: A variety of experimental programs and demonstration projects have emerged in recent years that build on the hypothesis that victim reporting and cooperation in law enforcement can be improved by alleviating the difficulties faced by the victim and by offering some prospect of financial reparation for injuries suffered as a result of the crime. These programs may be grouped in the categories of restitution programs, victim compensation statutes, and victim/witness programs. The victims' movement has led to a reconsideration of the scope of restitution in criminal law, whether the victim's interests are adequately represented by the prosecutor in the several stages of the criminal process, and whether criminal law should continue unenforced because prosecutors are too busy, when victims stand ready to prosecute on their own. White-collar crime is a special case in the devising of restitution procedures, since costs to individual victims may be difficult to determine and many victims may be involved in a single corporate offense. This may involve the action of proxy victims, who may be government agencies acting as complaining witnesses because they have gathered information about the defendant's criminal activities and the injuries suffered by individual victims. The notice sanction and class actions may also be involved in victim restitution. The victim deserves a voice in the criminal justice system, not only in hearings on the amount of restitution to be paid him/her but also on the offenses to be used as the basis for such restitution. The victim should have a right to participate in court hearings on dismissals, guilty pleas, and sentences. The victim should also sometimes be permitted to proceed on his/her own through private prosecution. A total of 93 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Restitution; Victims rights; White collar crime
Note: Law Memorial Lectures delivered on March 22-24, 1982, at the University of Mississippi.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.