skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 89866 Find in a Library
Title: Evaluation of Semimarked Police Vehicles
Author(s): T L Stoica
Corporate Author: Illinois Dept of Law Enforcement
Bureau of Planning and Development
United States of America
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 42
Sponsoring Agency: Illinois Dept of Law Enforcement
Springfield, IL 62706
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Greater use of patrol cars marked with decals only instead of with roof-mounted light bars (visabars) would reduce fuel consumption and increase arrests for certain traffic violations.
Abstract: An additional benefit of the greater use of semimarked cars would be better performance with respect to speed and acceleration. In 1982 the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement compared 60 semimarked vehicles with 60 units marked with visabars. The units worked on similar patrols and had similar workloads. The officers in the semimarked cars achieved better fuel mileage and had fewer and less severe accidents than those in marked units. They also achieved higher productivity in the issuance of citations for speeding. Officers perceived that the semimarked cars had a higher degree of public approval, greater productivity, better performance, and little impact on voluntary compliance with laws. They also noted greater difficulty in vehicle recognition by the public and some reduction in safety to the driver and the motoring public. However, at least half of the officers perceived no difference in safety between the two types of vehicles. In addition, 90 percent of the responding officers did not want visabars put on their semimarked units, 4 percent were undecided, and 6 percent would prefer a visabar. Data tables, four footnotes which contain references, and appendixes presenting the study instrument and comments from the 50 officers surveyed are provided.
Index Term(s): Energy conservation; Equipment evaluation; Police cars; Traffic law enforcement; Vehicle identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=89866

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.