skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 89985 Find in a Library
Title: Criminal Procedure as a Market System
Journal: Journal of Legal Studies  Volume:12  Issue:2  Dated:(June 1983)  Pages:289-332
Author(s): F H Easterbrook
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 44
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Prosecutorial discretion, plea bargaining, and sentencing discretion can be viewed as elements of a well-functioning market system that sets the 'price' of crime, such that proposals to restrict discretion produce effects similar to command-and-control regulation of the economy.
Abstract: A market is a system in which actors' transactions are limited by their resources and by legal rules that enforce transactions and prevent them from having severe effects on third parties. If transactions costs are not too high, the system yields efficient results by producing a state where further moves cannot improve anyone's lot without making someone else worse off. By contrast, in a regulatory system, people may trade only on terms or at times set by third parties. Trading under regulation produces an efficient result only if the regulator has set the same price that parties would have reached in their own bargaining. Criminal procedure is a method of allocating scarce resources. Police, judges, prosecutor, jails and jailers, and defense counsel are costly, and society gains by conserving their use. Crimes are even more costly. Efforts should aim at apportioning more resources to the criminal justice system until the savings from preventing the marginal crime just equal the costs of doing so. Further, the maximum deterrent effect should be achieved from whatever resources are committed to crime control. The latter objective tends to be achieved through the interactions of judges, prosecutors, and defendants in a market price-setting system. The appendix presents a model of plea bargaining that follows the settlement models of Gould and Landes. A total of 86 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Economic analysis; Judicial discretion; Plea negotiations; Prosecutorial discretion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.