Skip to main content skip navigation
  • Account
    • Login
    • Manage
  • Subscribe
    • JUSTINFO
    • Register
  • Shopping Cart
  • Contact Us
    • Email
    • Feedback
    • Chat
    • Phone or Mail
  • Site Help
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Office of Justice Programs header with links to bureaus/offices: BJA, BJS, NIJ, OJJDP, OVC, SMART Office of Justice Programs BJA BJS NIJ OJJDP OVC SMART Office of Justice Programs
Advanced Search  Search Help
    Browse By Topics  down arrow
  • A–Z Topics
  • Corrections
  • Courts
  • Crime
  • Crime Prevention
  • Drugs
  • Justice System
  • Juvenile Justice
  • Law Enforcement
  • Victims
CrimeSolutions
Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar
  • ABOUT NCJRS
  • OJP PUBLICATIONS
  • LIBRARY
  • SEARCH Q & A
  • GRANTS & FUNDING
  • JUSTICE EVENTS
Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

 

NCJ Number: 90169 Find in a Library
Title: Constitutional Limitations on Body Searches in Prisons
Journal: Columbia Law Review  Volume:82  Issue:5  Dated:(June 1982)  Pages:1033-1056
Author(s): D C James
Date Published: 1982
Annotation: This paper concludes that different kinds of prison searches should require varying levels of antecedent cause, since they differ in their security justifications and their intrusiveness; a sliding scale for analyzing fourth amendment limitations on body searches in prisons is proposed.
Abstract: To evaluate reasonableness of prison searches, courts should be sensitive to the precise type of search at issue. Different searches will, according to their circumstances and scope, differently affect the fourth amendment balance between government and prisoner interests. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Bell v. Wolfish, merely held that visual body cavity searches of prisoners need not always be justified by probable cause. Thus, the case did not establish indicia of suspicions necessary to justify more intrusive or demeaning body searches. In analyzing the adequacy of government justification for a particular search, courts should recognize a basic distinction between 'law enforcement' searches, for which individual indicia of suspicion may be identified, and 'administrative searches,' whose validity must rest on general institutional security needs. Administrative searches are in two categories: point-of-entry searches of all inmates entering the institution and those having unsupervised contact with outsiders, as well as internal searches conducted to curtail the circulation of contraband within prison. Since point-of-entry searches may sometimes offer officials their only opportunity to detect certain contraband and prevent its use, body searches are justified, but intrusive body cavity searches (as opposed to visual searches) should be justified by a level of individualized suspicion greater than that required for visual inspections. Since internal searches involve government and prisoner interests distinct from those raised by point-of-entry searches, individualized suspicion should be required for visual searches as well as body cavity searches. Further, all body cavity searches should be conducted in accordance with established institutional regulations known to the inmates. A total of 150 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Prisoner's rights; Right of privacy; Strip searches
Page Count: 24
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=90169

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.




Find in a Library

You have clicked Find in a Library. A title search of WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click "Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain active for 30 minutes. Learn More.

You have selected:

This article appears in

In WorldCat, verify that the library you select has the specific journal volume and issue in which the article appears. Learn How.

Continue to WorldCat

You are about to access WorldCat, NCJRS takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the WorldCat site.

 
Office of Justice Programs Facebook Page  Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Assistance Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics Twitter Page
  • National Institute of Justice Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office for Victims of Crime Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Facebook Page Twitter Page
  • Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking Facebook Page Twitter Page
Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers
USA.gov | CrimeSolutions
Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs