skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 90241 Find in a Library
Title: Compensation to Victims of Homicide
Journal: Social Defence  Volume:18  Issue:69  Dated:(July 1982)  Pages:41-59
Author(s): S V N Rajan; K P Krishna
Date Published: 1982
Page Count: 19
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: India
Annotation: This study looks at the kinds of relief, assistance, or compensation provided to the relatives of homicide victims in two Indian cities -- Bangalore in the South and Delhi in the North -- to determine the extent of hardship these people experienced and whether or not they would welcome assistance.
Abstract: A total of 143 next-of-kin of homicide victims were surveyed along with government and court officials. A major finding was that an overwhelming majority of bereaved families face hardship. A total of 14 percent of bereaved families in Bangalore and about 10 percent in Delhi have no one left to look after them after the family breadwinner was killed. Notwithstanding the tradition of mutual help, few individuals or voluntary organizations came forward to rescue needy families, and most donations were minimal. Only 10 percent of the victims had insurance to cover their expenses after the homicide. Also limited were instances where school children were given exemptions from payment of tuition or where family members were given employment. In both cities, government assistance was available but only in a limited number of cases. Such assistance was given as a very small lump sum of money. Most next-of-kin favored government compensation to the family, and many favored the idea of offender restitution. They feel that the families' economic needs should be the main criterion in deciding the amount of compensation. Data tables and four references are cited.
Index Term(s): Homicide; India; Needs assessment; Victim attitudes; Victim compensation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=90241

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.