skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 91414 Find in a Library
Title: Serious Offender Guidelines From Order to Violation (From Restitution Programs in Juvenile and Family Court, 1982, Tape R-12 - See NCJ-91403)
Author(s): J Tolan; A Oleisky; T Armstrong
Date Published: 1982
Sponsoring Agency: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
Reno, NV 89507
Sale Source: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
P.O. Box 8970
Reno, NV 89507
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Workshop presentations discuss the definition of the serious juvenile offender, identifying such offenders, and guidelines for using restitution with such offenders.
Abstract: One speaker explores the definitional issues regarding the serious offender, concluding that the severity of an offense will be determined by the value systems and particular crime problems experienced by a given community; however, repetitive offending is considered a serious problem in all communities. One presenter, who is a judge, lists his general criteria for determining a serious offender as related to age, whether the offender acted alone or in a gang, whether the crime occurred at night or in the daytime, and the nature of school performance. It is advised that the prediction of dangerousness is generally not reliable; however the repetition of violent offenses is a strong indication of dangerousness. It is concluded that one violent crime against a person, unless particularly heinous, should not disqualify a juvenile from community-based restitution. Where it is deemed that person should be confined in the interest of protecting the public, it is suggested that restitution might be made a condition for shortening the sentence and be made a part of a work release program. Restitution as a condition of parole is also suggested.
Index Term(s): Habitual offenders; Restitution; Violent juvenile offenders
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS. Running time: 1 hr. Tape does not cover entire presentation.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.