skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 91521 Find in a Library
Title: Learning From Experience, the Secret Service, and Controlled Experimentation (From Behavioral Science and the Secret Service, P 113-119, 1981, Jane Takeuchi et al, eds. - See NCJ-91518)
Author(s): L E Moses
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Academies Press
Washington, DC 20001
Sale Source: National Academies Press
500 Fifth Street, N.W.
Keck 360
Washington, DC 20001
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The author analyzes the controlled experimentation method involving simultaneous comparison of two well-defined different procedures on cases of unquestioned comparability and its relevance to evaluating Secret Service operations.
Abstract: This technique has produced convincing information with practical consequences in many areas, such as proving that followup calls might not improve survey response rates and that arrested persons with community ties may be safely released before trial without bail. However, an effective experimental approach using comparison groups contains certain essential elements. First, there must be two or more alternate ways of proceeding, and these procedures must be definitively described. The classes of subjects to whom the treatments are applicable also must be clearly defined, and the relevant outcomes and fair measurement methods agreed upon in advance. The alternative procedures should be applied simultaneously, with experimental and control groups determined by mechanically random choice. Using these principles as guidelines, the Secret Service could assess its tasks and procedures. The first experiment should focus on a small problem with a high likelihood of success because continuous vigilance is necessary to prevent any deviations from the essentials of controlled experimentation.
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Program evaluation; Research methods; US Secret Service
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=91521

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.