skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 91619 Find in a Library
Title: Voir Dire in the Criminal Case - A Primer
Journal: Trial  Volume:19  Issue:10  Dated:(October 1983)  Pages:60-65,108
Author(s): D C Johnson
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 5
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article provides guidelines for attorneys in the selecting of jurors.
Abstract: Counsel should know precisely the type of juror desired for a case before voir dire begins. The nature of the case should be analyzed, particularly with respect to possible emotional or prejudicial undercurrents. A discussion among the attorney, the client, a psychologist, and others can help develop profiles of the ideal and least desirable jurors. Voir dire may properly be used to determine whether a juror satisfies statutory requirements for serving on a jury. Jurors also may be questioned to determine whether they can fairly and impartially participate in deliberation on the issues in the cases based solely on the law and evidence presented at trial; however, the extent of questioning for this purpose is restricted to determining if the juror is biased or prejudiced as a matter of law. The courts also recognize that voir dire may be used to obtain information useful in exercising peremptory challenges. Once counsel has obtained the information disclosed by the jurors, it should be interpreted according to empirical evidence regarding the influence of personality and occupational characteristics on decisionmaking in criminal cases. Counsel must continually be mindful of the fact that regardless of juror characteristics, trial evidence is by far the more important determinant of the verdict, which is in turn interpreted under the influence of the logic and persuasion of counsel. Thirty-eight references are provided.
Index Term(s): Defense preparation; Juror characteristics; Jury selection; Voir dire
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=91619

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.