skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 91928 Find in a Library
Title: Harmless Error - Abettor of Courtroom Misconduct
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:74  Issue:2  Dated:(Summer 1983)  Pages:457-475
Author(s): V Bilaisis
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 19
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Deliberate violations of rules which regulate the conduct of prosecutors and judges at trial should not be measured by a harmless error standard, but should result in automatic reversals of decisions. This would create a most effective deterrent against erosion of defendants' due process rights.
Abstract: The English Exchequer Rule, which was adopted by American courts, required presumption of prejudice and virtually automatic reversals of convictions upon showing of error. This created backlogs and delays and thus was replaced by the 1919 harmless error statute which stated that if an error did not affect the defendant's substantial rights, it could be adjudged harmless. The Supreme Court interpreted this statute to include most errors not violating explicit constitutional rights. Moreover, the defendant has the burden of proving that the error affected his or her substantial rights, resulting in prejudice. The objective of rules that regulate prosecutoral and judicial conduct at trial is to shield the jury from matters upon which no evidence can be offered and which are likely to influence the verdict. For example, it is an error for the prosecutor to overtly appeal to jurors' passions or prejudices or to comment on the accused's silence. Likewise, the trial judge must not display hostility toward a defense counsel. Prosecutorial errors often occur because the prosecutor is trying unconditionally to secure a conviction in an adversarial system. However, courts disapprove of such conduct but uphold convictions or apply the harmless error standard and instruct the jury to disregard the prosecutor's conduct. Consequently, courts do not induce prosecutors to comply with trial rules governing their behavior and encourage systematic erosion of justice in the form of a high incidence of nontrivial errors. The automatic reversal standard would halt this trend and promote more rational verdicts. The paper includes 141 footnotes.
Index Term(s): Court rules; Courtroom decorum; Prosecutors; Trial procedures
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=91928

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.