skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 92025 Find in a Library
Title: Cultural Relativism and Comparative Criminology
Journal: Contemporary Crises  Volume:7  Issue:4  Dated:(1983)  Pages:371-391
Author(s): P Beirne
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 21
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: In examining recent comparative studies of crime, this paper argues that the comparative method used is taken from two incompatible propositions derived from Durkheimian empiricism.
Abstract: The two propositions critiqued are as follows: (1) the aim of comparative research is the construction of cross-cultural generalizations about social behavior; and (2) generalizations about social behavior can and must be constructed without reference to the values, motives, and intentions of those agents whose behavior is the raw material of study. The argument that in combination these two propositions are inappropriate for cross-cultural research proceeds in four stages. First, the essay defends the claim that comparative criminology must confront the existence of cultural variation in actions and meaning. In advancing this claim, attention is given to the alleged merits of cultural relativism, the several forms of which are condensed into methodological relativism and epistemological relativism. Methodological relativism is argued to be a strategy that putatively allows an observer to generalize about criminal behavior while remaining sensitive to cultural diversity. It is then argued that this strategy occasions difficulties because it avoids the role of values in human action, while epistemological relativism involves the more serious proposition that cultural and subjective values are impossible objects for comparative generalization. Finally, the argument admits to the virtues of epistemological relativism without succumbing to some of its more pernicious consequences. To accomplish this, it is maintained that comparative criminology must transform its traditional object of study. Sixty-six notes are provided.
Index Term(s): Comparative criminology; Cultural influences; Research methods
Note: Version of a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City, 1980
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.