skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 92030 Find in a Library
Title: Pre-Trial Diversion - Continuing Constitutional Concerns (From Legal Issues in Criminal Justice - The Courts, P 71-82, 1984, Sloan T Letman, et al, eds. - See NCJ-92029)
Editor(s): S T Letman; D W Edwards; D J Bell
Date Published: 1984
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Anderson Publishing Co
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Sale Source: Anderson Publishing Co
Publicity Director
2035 Reading Road
Cincinnati, OH 45202
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The growing number of court cases challenging the constitutionality of aspects of pretrial diversion procedures indicates a need for more detailed legislative, judicial, and administrative definitions of the rights of pretrial diversion participants.
Abstract: An analysis of the pretrial diversion concept initially reveals a well-intended and fair alternative to formal prosecution which results in a number of advantages for the accused. Since the pretrial diversion agreement is not a conviction, the accused is not obligated to indicate a criminal conviction on employment applications. Further, there is no public hearing with attendant embarrassment for the accused. Also, diversion is less time consuming than the traditional processing of cases through the courts, and the accused is also given the opportunity to avoid the possibility of pretrial detention. Still, legal issues bearing upon the rights of the accused in pretrial diversion processing continue to be raised in the courts. One legal issue concerns whether the due process clause of the 14th amendment entitles a pretrial divertee to an evidentiary hearing upon revocation of diversion status. Another legal issue focuses on whether a pretrial diversion potential participant should be required to enter a formal plea of guilty as a prerequisite to being enrolled in a diversion program. Whether there is a right to counsel in diversion revocation hearings is also a legal concern, as is whether the criteria, as stated and as applied, for eligibility constitute 'arbitrary or capricious' deprivation or withdrawal of protected interests. A number of New Jersey court cases that examined some of the preceding issues relevant to pretrial diversion procedures and legislation are discussed, and 19 notes are provided.
Index Term(s): New Jersey; Police diversion; Prosecutorial diversion; Rights of the accused
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.