skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 92281 Find in a Library
Title: Promoting Accountability in Making Bail Decisions Congressional Efforts at Bail Reform (From Dealing With Dangerous Offenders, Volume 2, 1983, by Daniel McGillis et al - See NCJ-92277)
Author(s): K Feinberg
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 27
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper discusses the content and implications of the congressional bail reform proposal found in Chapter 35 of S. 1630, The Criminal Code Reform Act of 1981, which substantially revises the Bail Reform Act of 1966.
Abstract: Chapter 35 of S. 1630 expressly addresses such issues as consideration of defendant dangerousness in setting nonfinancial conditions of release, the arbitrary imposition of financial conditions wich often cannot be satisfied by a defendant, and the need to expand the list of statutory release conditions. Additionally, the proposed bill expressly permits the pretrial detention of defendants in those cases where no conditions of release will ensure the appearance at trial or the safety of the community or other persons. Pretrial detention based on considerations of defendant dangerousness is, therefore, given statutory sanction. Simultaneously, the code provisions dramatically alter the existing use of money bail. The current debate over pretrial detention focuses primarily on three issues: (1) whether pretrial detention is constitutionally permissible, (2) whether a preventive detention statute that is appropriately narrow in scope and that provides necessarily stringent safeguards to protect the rights of defendants will be sufficiently workable, and (3) whether the premise of a pretrial detention statute -- that judges can predict with an acceptable degree of accuracy which defendants are likely to commit crimes if released -- is reasonable. The first two issues are examined in an analysis of the pretrial detention provisions of the District of Columbia Code. A copy of the congressional bill is provided.
Index Term(s): Bail reform; District of Columbia; Federal Bail Reform Act; Federal bail system; Pretrial detention
Note: Available on microfiche as NCJ-92277
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.