skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 92951 Find in a Library
Title: Weighted Dispositions - Adding Quality to Performance Measurement
Author(s): J E Jacoby; E C Ratledge
Corporate Author: Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies
Institute Director
United States of America
Date Published: 1982
Page Count: 28
Sponsoring Agency: Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies
Washington, DC 20036
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 80-IJ-CX-0032; 82-IJ-CX-0028
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: It may be possible to quantify the process prosecutors use to select acceptable minimum sanctions.
Abstract: This paper presents a practical approach which appears to overcome most measurement barriers. It also discusses use of a severity scale for sanctions. Disposition rates, while inadequate as a measurement of output for prosecutors and defense counsel, are in use today because few other measurement alternatives exist. The fact that even unsatisfactory measures are in use suggests a need for a practical means of measurement. The use of a severity scale would indicate the success of prosecution or defense of cases. The methodology in this study consisted of simulation using case histories developed in earlier research. A group of 193 attorneys from 1 prosecutor's office evaluated a range of sanctions. The subsequent analysis examined the average minimum sentence deemed acceptable for each case. Prosecutors do set limits for sanctions, finding some consistently unacceptable. Apparently, it is possible that the process prosecutors use to determine acceptability of sanctions can be quantified. Figures, tables, and seven notes are provided.
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Dispositions; Evaluation criteria; Offense classification; Penalty severity rating
Note: Paper presented to the Annual Conference of The American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada, November 1982
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=92951

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.